The High Court of Bombay disposed of an appeal where the appellant sought liberty to challenge future orders from the Single Judge. The appeal was withdrawn, and the pending Notice of Motion was disposed of.
Liberty granted to challenge subsequent orders; appeal and Notice of Motion disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 appl-241.16
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L.) NO.241 OF 2016 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1075 OF 2016
IN
SUIT NO.109 OF 2016
Shri. Anil Mohan Jaokar
… Applicant
Versus
Mr. Jayant Subrao Divgi and Ors.
… Respondents
Mr. Girish Godbole i/by Ms. Sanjukta Dey for the Applicant. Mr. Pankaj Kowli a/w Ms. Mayura Maru for the Respondent No.1. Mr. M.S. Deshpande, Court Receiver is present.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 11th JULY, 2016
P.C.
1 The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant has placed on record a letter dated 11th July, 2016 signed by the Appellant addressed to the Advocate on record for the Appellant. The letter is taken on record and marked 'X-1' for identification. The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant states that the Appellant is personally present in the Court.
2 The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant states that the Appellant desires to make appropriate application for appropriate
1 of 2
2 appl-241.16
relief before the learned Single Judge as regards the subsequent orders dated 1st July, 2016 and 4th July, 2016. He submits that if the said application/applications are rejected by the learned Single Judge or if the Appellant is aggrieved by the orders passed by the learned Single Judge on such application/ applications, he may be granted liberty to challenge the order impugned in this Appeal while challenging the orders passed on the application/ applications proposed to be made by him.
3 The prayer made is reasonable which deserves to be granted. Needless to state that all objections of the original plaintiff to the proceedings which may be filed by the Appellant remain open.
4 Subject to what is observed above, the Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Pending Notice of Motion does not survive and the same is disposed of.
(A.A. SAYED, J ) (A.S. OKA, J )
2 of 2
Shri. Anil Mohan Jaokar
Jayant Subrao Divgi
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
