Dismissed
Sorab Kaikhushroo Modi v. Izadyas Rohinton Irani
Bombay HCAPP/455/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
37-APPL-221-13-TS-5-07.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L) NO. 221 OF 2013
IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 5 OF 2007
Mr. Sorab Kaikhushroo Modi …Appellant Versus Izadyas Rohinton Irani …Respondent
…Respondent
None for the Appellant.
Mr. R.M. Nakhava, i/b Mr. Vasant Dhawan, for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 20th June 2016
P.C. :
1. On 17th March 2016 when the Appeal was called out,
Appellant appearing in person was not present. Therefore, the Court fixed Appeal on 26th April 2016 and the Registry was directed to issue intimation of the date fixed to the Appellant. Service Report dated 26th April 2016 shows that the house of the Appellant was found in locked condition. The order dated 26th April 2016 of this
Sharayu . 1 / 2
37-APPL-221-13-TS-5-07.doc
Court records that at the request made by the Appellant appearing in person, the Appeal was adjourned till today. Though the Appellant appearing in person was aware that the Appeal is to be listed today, he is not present. The Appeal was called out on two occasions today. Hence, Appeal is dismissed of for non prosecution.
[A.A. SAYED, J.] [A.S. OKA, J.]
2 / 2
Sharayu .
Sorab Kaikhushroo Modi
Izadyas Rohinton Irani
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court