Disposed

Man Infraprojects Limited v. Man Industries (India) Limtied

Bombay HC18 Jul 2016APP/422/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay disposed of the appeal as withdrawn, granting liberty to the appellant to approach the Single Judge and continuing an interim consent arrangement for three weeks while keeping respondent's objections open.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed of as withdrawn; liberty to file proceedings before Single Judge; interim arrangement continued for three weeks.

Man Infraprojects Limited Vs Man Industries (India)… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 appl-578.15

¶2

pmw

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

APPEAL (L.) NO.578 OF 2015 IN COMPANY APPLICATION (L.) NO.527 OF 2015 IN COMPANY SCHEME PETITION NOS.658 AND 659 OF 2014 CONNECTED AND COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NOS.346 AND 347 OF 2014

¶5

Man Infraprojects Limited … Appellant Versus Man Industries (India) Limited … Respondent

¶6

Mr. Zal Andhyarujina i/by M/s. Rajani Associates for the Appellant. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w Aditya Shiralkar i/by Kanga & Co. for the Respondent.

¶7

CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ.

¶8

DATE : 18^th JULY, 2016

¶9

P.C.

¶10

1 The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant on instructions seeks permission to withdraw this Appeal with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the learned Single Judge. He prays for continuation of ad-interim arrangement in this Appeal to enable the Appellant to move the learned Single Judge. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent states that he has no objection if the arrangement recorded in the order dated 14^th August, 2015 is continued

1 of 2

appl-578.15

for a period of three weeks. He, however, submits that all objections of the Respondent to the proceedings which may be filed by the Appellant may be kept open. Needless to add that the liberty is granted to the Appellant to file proceedings for such reliefs as may be permissible in accordance with law. Accordingly, we dispose of the Appeal by passing the following order :-

¶15

ORDER

¶16

(i) Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed;

¶17

(ii) We make it clear that all contentions of the Respondent

¶18

on the proceedings which may be taken by the Appellant are expressly kept open;

¶19

(iii) The consent arrangement recorded in clause 3 of the order dated 14^th August, 2015 will continue to operate for a period of three weeks from today without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties;

¶20

(iv) In view of the disposal of the Appeal, all pending Notices of Motions and Chamber Summons are disposed of.

¶21

(A.A. SAYED, J )

¶22

(A.S. OKA, J )

¶23

2 of 2

Man Infraprojects Limited v. Man Industries (India) Limtied

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Man Infraprojects Limited v. Man Industries (India) Limtied

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Rehman Mohd.Yusuf Khan and Anr. Vs Rajnikant Devidas Shroff

Topworth Pipes and Tubes Pvt. Ltd. Vs M.S.T.C. Limited

Mrs. Kavita Mangesh Kharatkar Nee Ms.Ravita @ Kavita Vitthal Masne Vs Mr.Mangesh Buddhaji Kharatkar

Mohit Bhardwaj Vs Splendor Complex Co. Op Housing Society Ltd. 15 Others

M/S. Jindal Taxo-Fab Ltd., Vs M/S. Siddhchem (P) Ltd.

M/S. Om Omega Shelter Vs Lokhandwala Infasructure Pvt. Ltd. and 27 Ors.