This is a one-line order where the High Court of Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, allowed the appellants to withdraw their appeal. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40.APP373_2015
vidya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 373 OF 2015 IN
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 28 OF 2004 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 115 OF 2001
Vrajeshkumar P. Sampat & Anr.
... Appellant
vs.
Damayanti D. Sampat & Ors.
... Respondents
Mr. B.S. Nayak, Advocate for the appellant.
CORAM: A.S. OKA &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 4, 2016.
P.C.
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission to
withdraw the Appeal. Accordingly, the Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
1 Of 1
Vrajeshkumar P. Sampat & Anr.
Damayanti D. Sampat & Ors.
A.S. Oka
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
