The High Court of Bombay disposed of Appeal (L.) No. 378 of 2012 because the underlying Suit No. 3091 of 2011 and associated Notice of Motion had already been disposed of. Consequently, no matter survives in the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appl-378.12
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L.) NO.378 OF 2012 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3742 OF 2011
IN
SUIT NO.3091 OF 2011
Narsimha Enterprises & Anr. … Appellants Versus Medtronic Inc & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Rahul D. Motkari for the Appellants. Mr. Sumeet Rane i/by Lagasis Partners for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & P.D. NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 18th MARCH, 2016
P.C.
The files of the Appeals have been misplaced. From the cause list it appears that the Appeal arises out of the order passed in Notice of Motion No.3742 of 2011 in Suit No.3091 of 2011. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondents tenders across the Bar order dated 27th February, 2013 passed in Suit No.3091 of 2011 by which the Suit has been decreed and Notice of Motion No.3742 of 2011 has been disposed of. In view of the disposal of the Suit and Notice of Motion, nothing survives in the Appeal and accordingly the Appeal is disposed of. Pending Notice of Motion does not survive and the same is disposed of.
(P.D. NAIK, J ) (A.S. OKA, J )
1 of 1
Narsimha Enterprises & Anr.
Medtronic Inc & Ors.
A.S. OKA
P.D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
