The High Court dismissed the appeal as the appellant failed to deposit the required amount within the time granted under the self-operative order dated 15.2.2015.
The appeal is dismissed as the appellant failed to comply with the order dated 15.2.2015 by depositing the amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40-818.15.doc
Pvr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL (L) No.818 of2015 IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO.576 OF 2013
Siddhivinayak Builders Mumbai VS
.. Appellant
Kishankumar G.Karia .. Respondent
Mr.S.A.Vaidya for Appellant Mr.S.A.Bhagwat a/w Mr.S.S.Kumbhar for i/b Mr.H.H.Nagi for Respondent
CORAM : A.S.OKA & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ. DATED : 14 March, 2016
P.C.
15.2.2015. Admittedly, the Appellants have not deposited the amount within the time granted under the said order. Order dated 15.2.2015 is self-operative and therefore, on completion of the period of four weeks on 15.2.2015, the Appeal stood dismissed. Learned counsel for the Appellants pointed out that though a Special Leave Petition has been preferred by the Appellants against the said order before the Apex Court, the same has not been listed.
40-818.15.doc
Pvr
[G.S. KULKARNI, J] [A.S.OKA,J.]
Siddhivinayak Builders Mumbai
Kishankumar G. Karia
A.S. Oka
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
