The single-judge bench dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear in either the morning or afternoon sessions of the court on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
osappl533
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL (L) NO.533 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
None for the Appellant
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
P.D.NAIK,JJ.
DATE : MARCH 17, 2016
P.C.
1None appeared for the appellant in
the morning session. In the afternoon
session,noneappearsforthe
appellant. Hence, we dismiss the appeal
for non prosecution.
Appellant
Respondent
A.S.Oka
P.D.Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court