Criminal Application challenging an FIR and charge-sheet on evidence appreciation grounds dismissed as the trial court remains the appropriate forum; extraordinary jurisdiction declined.
Criminal Application disposed of; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0507apl934.15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 934/2015.
Pramod Pratapsingh Pawar and others. - VERSUS-
The State of Maharashtra and another.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &
KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : JULY 05, 2016.
Heard Shri S.V. Sirpurkar, learned Counsel
for applicants and Shri N.S. Rao, learned A.P.P. for respondent No.1 .
Order
0507apl934.15
2
advised. We are not inclined to interfere in extra ordinary jurisdiction, hence, APL is disposed of. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere in the Extraordinary Jurisdiction given the existence of a remedy before the trial court regarding appreciation of evidence in a regular case.
Whether the challenge to the FIR and charge-sheet warrants special leave in this criminal application.
Pramod Pratapsingh Pawar and others
The State of Maharashtra and another
B. P. Dharmadhikari
Kum. Indira Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
