In Criminal Application No. 699 of 2016, the court disposed of the application as withdrawn because the court could not pass an order of quashing based on filed consent terms.
Application disposed of as withdrawn; no adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k
1/1
pro 3 cr apl 699.16 as .doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATEJURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.699 OF 2016
Chinmai Sanjay Shinde ….. Applicant V/s The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ….. Respondents
Mr. Manish Bohra i/b M/s. A.S. Khan & Associates for the Applicant. Mrs. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent No.1 and 2. Ms. Arti B. Bhoir i/b Mr. Rishi Bhuta for Respondent No3.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED : 29 JUNE 2016
ORDER:
filed on record the order of quashing cannot be passed, the learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks permission to withdraw the Application. Accordingly, the Application is disposed of as withdrawn. We, however, make it clear that no adjudication is made on the merits of the pending case and all the contentions of the parties in that behalf are kept open.
katkam
1/1
Chinmai Sanjay Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
