Ranjit K. Balan and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Application disposed of without lump sum in the absence of amicable settlement; remedy kept open before appropriate court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
apl-513.15
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL SIDE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.513 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Ms. Anita Wakchaure i/b Shri Vijay R. Shinde for the Applicant. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent No.1. Shri Y.G. Thorat i/b Shri Ashok B. Tajane for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ DATED : 7TH JULY 2016
P.C.:
. Even as of today, there is no amicable
settlement between the contesting parties. It is not in dispute that the chargesheet has been filed as against the Applicant on 24th August 2015. Hence, remedy is available to the Applicant before the appropriate Court. By keeping the said remedy and the contentions of the Applicant expressly open, we dispose of this Application.
Applicant
Respondent No.1
Respondent No.2
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court