This single-line order dismisses a criminal application for keeping remedies open because a charge sheet was filed against the applicant during pendency. The court accepted the counsel's statement and disposed of the matter without hearing contentions.
Application dismissed on keeping remedies open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
34.APL.473.2015.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 473 OF 2015
Sunil Ramkesav Dubey … Applicant Vs State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents
None for the applicant. Dr. F. R. Shaikh, APP for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Nikhil Chaudhari for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : A. S. OKA & A. A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 21 JUNE, 2016. P.C. :
None appears for the Applicants. The learned counsel
appearing for the 2nd Respondent (1st informant) states that during the pendency of the application, charge sheet has been filed by the police even as against the Applicant. We accept the said statement. In view of the said statement, Applicant has remedies available under the statute. By keeping the remedies open, the application is disposed of. All contentions are kept open.
(A. A. SAYED, J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)
Habeeb 1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application should be disposed of when the applicant now has remedies available under the statute due to the filing of a charge sheet.
Sunil Ramkesav Dubey
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No. 2
A. S. Oka
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
