The criminal application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of any party on the date of hearing on July 15, 2016.
The application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apl399.13.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.399/2013
Indira w/o Late Ramakant Pandey and anr. ..vs.. State of Maharashtra through PSO Kalamna and anr.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : JULY 15, 2016
This Court had, on 08.07.2016, discharged the learned counsel appearing for the applicant and then the matter was fixed for today.
Today, nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicants. Even none appears for the non applicants also.
In that view of the matter, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE JUDGE
kahale
Indira w/o Late Ramakant Pandey
State of Maharashtra
B. R. Gavai
V. M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
