Dismissed

Raosaheb Bhaurao Zalte and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC8 Jun 2016APL/211/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of two criminal applications filed post-charge sheet filing for quashing an FIR under Section 482 CrPC 1973. Holding that applicants have a remedy via discharge prayer before the trial court with necessary priority, the applications were dismissed with merit contentions kept open.

What did the court decide?

Applications disposed of; all contentions on merits kept open.

Raosaheb Bhaurao Zalte and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Quashing and FIR | Bombay HC (2016)

apl211-318

ssp

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.211 OF 2014 WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.318 OF 2014

¶7

Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders

¶8

Mr.Balkrishna Joshi and Mr.Virendra Pethe for the
Applicants

¶9

Dr.F.R.Shaikh, APP for the Respondent No.1
Mr.Santosh Shirsat for respondent No.2

¶10

CORAM :A.S.OKA AND
 A.A.SAYED,JJ.
DATE : JUNE 8, 2016

¶11

P.C.

¶12

1Whentheseapplicationsfor
quashing the FIR under section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973
were filed, in fact, charge sheets were
already filed before the concerned
Court. There was no challenge to the
charge sheets which was incorporated
subsequently. Therefore, the applicants
have a remedy available before the
concerned Court. Considering the nature
of the case, we are sure that if
applications are made before the
concerned Court for grant of discharge,
the said Court will give necessary
priority to the hearing of the

¶13

2 apl211-318

¶14

applications.

¶15

2Subject to what is observed above,
the applications are disposed of. All
contentions on merits are kept open.

¶16

(A.A.SAYED,J)(A.S.OKA,J.)

Raosaheb Bhaurao Zalte and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raosaheb Bhaurao Zalte and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikram Davendra Ahuja and Anr. Vs Tania Vijaysingh Deol and 6 Ors.

Clifford John Menezes and 4 Ors. Vs Romell Properties Private Ltd. and 2 Ors.

Sanyam Realtors Private Limited Vs Kantilal Khimji Haria and 7 Ors.

Stany Goveas Vs Nancy Stany Goveas

Kailash Rameshlal Malani and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rekesh Shankar Shetty and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.