The Bombay High Court at Nagpur disposed of Criminal Application No. 9 of 2016 as withdrawn by the applicant, with liberty to apply for discharge, explicitly stating the application was not decided on merits.
Application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to apply for discharge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12.7APL.9.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 9 OF 2016. (Narendra s/o Maniramji Meshram .vs. State of Maharashtra & others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. R.M. Daga, Advocate for applicant, Mr. C.A. Lokhande, A.P.P. for respondent nos. 1 & 2. Mr. R.M. Daruwala, Advocate for respondent no. 3.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : JULY 12, 2016.
The learned Counsel for the applicants seeks liberty to withdraw the Criminal Application with further liberty to apply for discharge.
The Criminal Application is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed.
It is made clear that we have not decided the Criminal Application on merits. Even if the application for discharge is filed, the same will be considered purely on its own merits.
Judge Judge
J.
C E R T I F I C A T E
“I certify that this Order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order”.
Uploaded by : Ki. Jeswani, Uploaded on : 13.7.2016.
Narendra s/o Maniramji Meshram
State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
V.M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
