The Bombay High Court acquitted applicants in a family dispute arising from a minor altercation over a lock and key, holding it purely personal and amenable to settlement.
Criminal Application allowed; complaint quashed in terms of prayer clause(a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-APL-1363-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1363 OF 2016
Mr. V. V. Purwant a/w Mr. Vikrant Phatale for the Applicants. Mrs. M. H. Mhatre, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Prashant Kamble for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE AND Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : NOVEMBER 29, 2016
1/3
Vikrant Elgire
14-APL-1363-2016
P.C.:
2/3
Vikrant Elgire
14-APL-1363-2016
his nephews and others abused him and tried to assault him.
(Ms. NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.)
3/3
Vikrant Elgire
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal complaint filed under sections 143, 147, 149, 323, 327, 504 and 506 IPC should be quashed as it arises from a personal FAMILY dispute amenable to settlement.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & AnotherApplied¶35
(2012) 10 SCC 303 · Who else cites this
Uday Ramesh Patil and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
Ravikant Shankarappa Patil
V. M. Kanade
Nutan D. Sardessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
