Disposed
Vinesh Rashmikant Shah and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCAPL/135/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
appln-135.16
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.135 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Shri Amarendra Mishra for the Applicants. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 10TH JUNE 2016
P.C.:
. It is an admitted position that the chargesheet
has been filed against the Applicants. This is not the case where the Applicants are relying upon any documents which are not part of the chargesheet. Hence, the appropriate remedy for the Applicants is open. The Application is disposed of. All contentions on merits and the remedies are kept open.
Applicants
Respondent No.1
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court