The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The High Court allowed the withdrawal, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn. The suit does not address any substantive legal issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(15) AO 682-15
Amk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 682 OF 2015 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 836 OF 2015
Mr. Sachin Manohar Chopra .. Appellant Vs.
Rupji Constructions .. Respondent
Mr. K. Padmashri i/b Kulkarni & Associates for the Appellant.
CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE : 28th NOVEMBER, 2016.
P. C. :
appeal.
No. 836 of 2015 does not survive and stands disposed of.
[G. S. KULKARNI, J.]
1/1
Sachin Manohar Chopra
Rupji Constructions
G. S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court