In Criminal Application No. 35 of 2016, the Bombay High Court heard a criminal appeal filed by the State against an acquittal. Leave to appear was granted and the appeal was admitted. The respondent waived notice. The court perused evidence and the impugned judgment.
The Criminal Application was admitted and proceedings were called for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21-ALS-35-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.35 OF 2016
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
)...APPLICANT
V/s.
GUNWANT LIMBAJI KHURANGALE )...RESPONDENT
Ms.A.A.Takalkar, APP for the Applicant – State.
Mr.Pramod Patil, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR, J. DATE : 29th NOVEMBER 2016.
P.C. :
1 Heard. Perused the evidence of the complainant as well as panch no.1. Also perused the impugned judgment and the order of acquittal.
2 Leave granted.
Appeal admitted.
Call for Record and Proceedings.
Learned counsel Mr.Pramod Patil waives notice for respondent.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to admit the criminal appeal against acquittal?
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
GUNWANT LIMBAJI KHURANGALE
A. M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
