The Single Judge of the Bombay High Court disposed of a civil suit following the tendering of consent terms signed by representatives of the plaintiff and defendants, without drawing up a decree.
Suit disposed on consent terms; interim proceedings declared infructuous; decree dispenses with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-S-696-2016.DOC
JSN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 696 OF 2016
USV Private Limited…Plaintiff
Versus
Alwin Wilcure Pharmaceuticals and Another…Defendants
Ms. Pooja Kshirsagar, i/b Bharat Shah and Company for the
Plaintiff.
Mr. Amogh K. Karandikar, for the Defendants.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 29th September 2016
PC:-
1.The Suit is settled. The Consent Terms are tendered. I have
seen the Consent Terms. These are signed by the Senior Deputy
General Manager of the Plaintiffs and a Partner of Defendant No.1.
The other partners have also signed., as have the Advocates for the
parties.
2.The Consent Terms are in order. They are not contrary to
law. They appear to have been drawn by the parties of their own
volition and reflect their true intentions.
Page 1 of 2
29th September 2016
903-S-696-2016.DOC
3.The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for
identification. The undertakings in the Consent Terms, particularly
those in clause 8, are accepted as undertakings to the Court.
4.The Suit is disposed in accordance with the Consent Terms.
Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules. Drawn
up decree / order is dispensed with.
5. All interim proceedings are infructuous and are disposed as such.
6. Defendant No.2 is from Himachal Pradesh. A Vakalatnama signed by him has been couriered to the Advocates in Bombay. They will file that Vakalatnama in the Registry on or before 7th October 2016.
7. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
29th September 2016
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court