COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
250-S3511-06.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3511 OF 2006
Raymond Limited…Plaintiffs
Versus
V.S. Venkatesh, Sole Proprietor of M/s. Lookmen …Defendants
Dresses
None for the Plaintiffs.
None for the Defendants.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:3rd October 2016
PC:-
1. None for the Plaintiffs. This is a Suit of 2006. It was kept back. None appears for the Plaintiffs even on a second call.
2. The Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim/ad-interim orders, if any, stand vacated forthwith.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
3rd October 2016
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court