Disposed
Jumpball Ventures LLP v. Jay Robotix Pvt.Ltd and Anr.
Bombay HCS/33/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905-S-33-2016.DOC
JSN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.33 OF 2016
Jumpball Ventures L.L.P.
Versus
… Plaintiff
Jay Robotix Private Limited and Another…Defendants
Mr. Hiren Kamod, i/b Zunjarrrao and Company for the Plaintiff.
Ms. Pranali Adangle, i/b M/s. K. Ashar and Company for the
Defendants.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:23rd August 2016
PC:-
1.The Suit is settled. Counsel on both sides are to be thanked
for their efforts in bringing about a satisfactory resolution to their
dispute.
2.Consent Terms are tendered. These are signed by one Mr.
Suhas Acharya, a Directors of the Plaintiff, and one Mr. Sravan
Kumar Reddy Kunchala, the authorised signatory of the Defendant
No.1, and also as a Director of Defendant No.2. The Consent Terms
are also signed by the Advocates of the parties. Both signatories are
present in Court.
3.I have seen the Consent Terms. They appear to be in order.
They are not contrary to law. The Consent Terms are drawn up by
Page 1 of 2
23rd August 2016
905-S-33-2016.DOC
the parties of their own volition and reflect the parties’ true
intentions. Provisions are made in regard to the use and
discontinuation of specified marks as also for trade mark registration
applications and certain trade marks and logos. A provision is made
in clause 10 in regard to the rival domain names.
4.I take the Consent Terms on record and mark them “X” for
identification. I accept the undertakings in the Consent Terms as
undertakings to the Court.
5.The Suit is disposed of in accordance with the Consent
Terms. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the rules.
Drawn up orders or decree dispensed with. Should either of the
parties require a drawn up order and decree, they will each be
entitled, on production of an authenticated copy of this order, to
apply for such a drawn up order / decree, and will not be required to
a make a fresh application for that purpose.
6. The Notice of Motion is infructuous and is disposed of as such.
7. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
23rd August 2016
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court