Allowed

Sony Music Entertainment India Private Limited v. Gamma Gaana Ltd. and Anr.

Bombay HC10 Mar 2016S/323/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bench allowed the withdrawal of the copyright infringement suit filed by Sony Music Entertainment India Private Limited against Gamma Gaana Ltd. and others, following an agreement between the parties and withdrawal of related notices and petitions.,

What did the court decide?

The suit was allowed to be withdrawn; Court fees refunded if any; Notice of Motion disposed of.

Sony Music Entertainment India Private Limited… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

910-SL98-16.DOC

¶2

Shephali

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT (L) NO. 98 OF 2016

¶4

WITH

¶5

NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 477 OF 2016

¶6

Sony Music Entertainment India Private Limited…Plaintiffs
Versus

¶7

Gamma Gaana Ltd. & Anr.…Defendants

¶8

Dr. Veerendra Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Viraag
Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Amit Jamsandekar,
with Mr. Vishal Maheshwari, Mr. Dhiraj Mehetre, Mr. Bankim
Gangar, i/b M/s. Khaitan Legal Associates, for the Plaintiffs.

¶9

Mr. Venkatesh Dhond, Senior Advocate, a/w Dr. Birendra Saraf,
Vanditta Malhotra Hegde, Mr. Rashmin Khandekar, Ms.
Ravina Rajpal, Mr. Tejas Chavan, Ms. Sayaly Tomey, i/b M/s.
Singh Singh and Malhotra and Hegde, for the Defendant No. 1.
Mr. Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ravi Kadam,
i/b Prabhakar Jadhav, for the Defendant No. 2.

¶10

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J. DATED: 10th March 2016

¶11

PC:-

¶12

1.On instructions, Dr. Tulzapurkar, learned Senior Counsel for
the Plaintiffs states that the Defendants having agreed to withdraw
their notice under Section 31D of the Copyright Act, 1957 their
application under Section 31B of that Act, as also the Writ Petition

¶13

1 of 2

¶14

910-SL98-16.DOC

¶15

that they had filed before this Court, the Plaintiffs wish to withdraw
the present Suit. He also confirms that an agreement has been
entered into between the parties. This submission is noted.

¶16

2. The Suit is allowed to be withdrawn. Refund of Court fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

¶17

3. In view of disposal of the Suit, nothing survives in the Notice of Motion and it is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶18

4. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

¶19

(G. S. PATEL, J.)

¶20

2 of 2

Sony Music Entertainment India Private Limited v. Gamma Gaana Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sony Music Entertainment India Private Limited v. Gamma Gaana Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bal Vikas Mahila Mandal Vs Roshan Ronald D Souza and Anr. and Maegan Jovita D Souza (Minor)

Swti Bal Vikas Vs Matteo Ponte and Dalla Via Federica

Missionaries of Charity Vs Allesandro Ivaldi and Anr.(Prop Adopters)

Mohammed Iqbal Shikh S/O Abdul Sattar Shaikh Vs .....................................

Shree Krishna Plastics Vs Reliance Communications Ltd. Cin No. L45309MH2004PLC147531

Tehmaas Sorab Gorimaar Vs Darayus Tehmaas Gorimaar (Minor) and Anr.