Damas Jewellery Llc v. D'Damas Jewllery India Private Limited and 5 Ors.
Bombay HCS/198/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Settlement of Suit No. 198 of 2016. Plaintiff and Defendants executed a Settlement Agreement and two Deeds of Assignment. Court recorded documents, vacated an interim order, accrued relief per agreement, and declared Notice of Motion infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Suit decreed in accordance with Settlement Agreement. Notice of Motion held infructuous. Previous interim order vacated. Registry to issue certified copies of settlement documents.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
905-S-198-2016.DOC
¶2
JSN
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO.198 OF 2016
¶4
Damas Jewellery LLC… Plaintiff
Versus
¶5
D’Damas Jewellery India Pvt Ltd & Ors. …Defendants
¶6
Mr. Zoeb Cutterywala, i/b ALMT Legal for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Tushar Mittal, i/b Bharucha and Partners for the Defendants.
¶7
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:25th August 2016
¶8
PC:-
¶9
1.The Suit is settled. Advocates for both sides have drawn up
minutes of the order. These are taken on record and marked “Y” for
identification. The parties have entered into a Settlement
Agreement dated 21st July 2016. Accompanying this are two Deeds
of Assignment also dated 21st July 2016. The Settlement Agreement
is signed by the authorised signatory of the parties as are the two
assignment deeds.
¶10
2.The three documents mentioned above, i.e. Settlement
Agreement and two Deeds of Assignment are taken on record and
marked “X”, “X1” and “X2” respectively for identification.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- respondent
D'Damas Jewellery India Pvt Ltd
Coram
AI extract
G.S. PATEL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court