The High Court of Bombay dismissed Suit No. 185 of 2016 as withdrawn by the plaintiffs. The associated Notice of Motion was disposed of as infructuous.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn; Notice of Motion disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
279-S185-16+.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 185 OF 2016
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 973 OF 2016
Novex Communications Private Limited…Plaintiffs
Versus
Bharat Hotels Limited & 4 Others…Defendants
Mr. Prakash Shah, with Mr. Jas Sanghvi, i/b PDS Legal, for the
Plaintiffs.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 4th October 2016
PC:-
1.Mr. Shah on behalf of the Plaintiffs states that the Defendant
No. 5 assigned certain copyright-protected works to the Plaintiffs.
Defendants Nos. 1 to 4 have paid necessary license fees to the
Plaintiffs. On these statements being made, Mr. Shah seeks leave to
withdraw the Suit.
2.The Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fee, if
any, in accordance with the Rules. Drawn up order dispensed with.
Page 1 of 2
4th October 2016
279-S185-16+.DOC
3. In view of this, the Notice of Motion does not survive and is disposed of as infructuous.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
4th October 2016
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court