Petitioner withdrew the writ petition seeking liberty to pursue an alternate remedy under the Goa Maintenance of Public Order and Safety Act, 1988.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 20 OF 2015
SHRI SANDEEP K. PUJARI., ... Petitioner Versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NORTH GOA DISTRICT AND 2 ORS., ... Respondents
... Respondents
Shri Arun Bras De Sa and Shri Kapil Kerkar, Advocates for the Petitioner. Shri S.R. Rivankar, Public Prosecutor for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:1st April, 2015
P.C:
Heard Shri De Sa, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Rivankar, learned Public Prosecutor for the State, for sometime.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
EV
SHRI SANDEEP K. PUJARI
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, NORTH GOA DISTRICT
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
