The High Court disposed of the writ petition holding that the Petitioner's grievance was redressed as the Consumer Court award amount was deposited with the Registry, leading to dismissal.
Petition dismissed; Petitioner allowed to apply to Registry for withdrawal of deposited amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.952.2013.2.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 952 OF 2013
Shri. Sudhir Nanasaheb } Deshpande } Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra } and Anr. } Respondents
Ms. Swarna P. Munshi i/b. Mr. A. M. Koyande for the Petitioner.
Mr. Bharat Mehta – AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATED :- DECEMBER 16, 2015
P.C. :-
In view of the written instructions received by Mr.Mehta, learned AGP that the amount under the Award of the Consumer Court has been deposited with the Registry of that Court, we are of the view that the grievance of the Petitioner is redressed. Nothing survives in the Petition. It is disposed of. The Petitioner is at liberty to apply to the Registry of the Consumer Court for withdrawal of the sum deposited in terms of the Award.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Shri. Sudhir Nanasaheb Deshpande
The State of Maharashtra
S. C. Dharmadhikari
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
