Petitions sought leave to withdraw writ petitions with liberty to pursue alternate remedies. Permission was granted and the writ petitions were disposed of as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw writ petitions with liberty to prosecute alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.9457.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 9457 OF 2015
Ganesh Kisan Wankhede ...PETITIONER versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ...RESPONDENTS
Mr. Shaikh Ashpak Taher Patel, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.K. Tambe, A.G.P. For respondents No. 1 and 3 to 5. Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No. 2- Election Commission
WRIT PETITION NO. 9458 OF 2015
Lilabai Santosh Pungle ...PETITIONER versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ...RESPONDENTS
Mr. Shaikh Ashpak Taher Patel, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. V.G. Shelke, A.G.P. For respondents No. 1 and 3 to 5. Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No. 2- Election Commission
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2015
Order :-
Sd/-
( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. )
MTK
Ganesh Kisan Wankhede
Lilabai Santosh Pungle
The State of Maharashtra
The Election Commission
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
