Petitioner sought liberty to withdraw the criminal writ petition. The court granted the liberty to withdraw and disposed of the matter as withdrawn without deciding on merits.
Liberty to withdraw the petition was granted; the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) Cri. W.P. No. 92 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Criminal Writ Petition No. 92 of 2014
Chandraprakash s/o. Vitthalrao Nagime, Age : 60 years, Occupation : Medical Practitioner, R/o. Chakur, Taluka : Chakur, District : Latur, & 5 others. .. Petitioners.
versus
Ramrao s/o. Almaji Patil (Sankaye), Age : 68 years, Occupation : Agriculture, R/o. Mahalangra, Taluka : Chakur, District : Latur, & another.
.. Respondents.
Ms. Supriya L. Pansambal, Advocate, holding for Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. S.S. Halkude, Advocate, for respondent no.1.
Mr. S.M. Jadhav, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent no.2 - State.
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATE : 18TH MARCH 2015
(2) Cri. W.P. No. 92 of 2014
PER COURT :
( SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV )
JUDGE
puranik / CRIWP92.14
Chandraprakash s/o. Vitthalrao Nagime & 5 others
Ramrao s/o. Almaji Patil (Sankaye)
State
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
