Dismissed

Archana Arvind Kore and Another v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary of Department of Cooperative, Mumbai and 3 Others

Bombay HC26 Feb 2015WP/876/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging the election process, the Court, citing the judgment of Election Commission of India vs. Ashok Kumar, declined to exercise extraordinary intervention as the process was already underway, directing petitioners to pursue alternate remedies.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition rejected with right to pursue alternative remedy reserved.

Archana Arvind Kore and Another Vs State of Maharashtra through… — Election Law | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

26.02.wp.876.15.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 876/2015

¶4

(Archana Arvind Kore and another vs. State of Maharashtra and others )

¶5

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

Mr. M.P.Kariya, Adv.for petitioner/s Mrs.Kalyani Deshpande, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2

¶7

CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & Mrs. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ. DATED : 26^th February, 2015.

¶8

Heard.

¶9

The election process is already set in motion. In that view of the matter and in view of the judgment of the apex Court in the case of Election Commission of India vs. Ashok Kumar and others : reported in (2000 ) 8 SCC 216, we are not inclined to interfere in the extraordinary jurisdiction.

¶10

In any case, the petitioners have an alternate remedy available in law to challenge the election, if according to them, it is not held in accordance with law.

¶11

Writ Petition is rejected reserving the right in favour of the petitioners to take recourse to alternate remedy.

¶12

JUDGEJUDGE

¶13

sahare

Archana Arvind Kore and Another v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary of Department of Cooperative, Mumbai and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Archana Arvind Kore and Another v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary of Department of Cooperative, Mumbai and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pundlik S/O Baliram Shinde Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Public Works Deparment, Mumbai and 4 Others

Swarnish S/O Ramchandra Ghodeswar Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Finance Dept. Mumbai and 5 Others

Smt. Chhaya Shyamnath Kumbhare Vs State of Maharashtra, Rural Development through Its Secretary, Mumbai and 2 Others

Punya Coal Roadlines through Its Proprietor Shri Yugpradhan S/O Pannalal Mehta Vs Western Coal Fields Limited, Coal Estate, Nagpur and Antoher

M/S Punya Coal Roadlines through Its Prop. Mr. Yugpradhan S/O P. Mehta and Others Vs M/S Western Coalfields Limited, Nagpur through Its Managing Director-Cum-Chairman and Another

M/S Punya Coal Roadlines through Its Prop. Mr. Yugpradhan S/O P. Mehta and Others Vs M/S Western Coalfields Limited, Nagpur through Its Managing Director-Cum-Chairman and Another