Mohammed Ashfaque Ansari v. the Dy. Hydraulik Engineer
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
wp.850.2014_2.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.850 OF 2014
Mohammed Ashfaque Ansari & Ors. ... Petitioners
Vs.
Deputy Hydraulic Engineer & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr.Mohit Jadhav for the Petitioners None for Respondents
CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & SHRI C.V. BHADANG, JJ.
DATE: 12th JANUARY, 2015
P.C.:
The learned Counsel for the Petitioners has tendered an affidavit of the petitioner No.1 in the Court today. The same is accepted on record. It is stated in the affidavit that for the reasons stated therein, the cause of action for filing the writ petition would not survive. The petitioners have prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted and it is disposed of as withdrawn.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.) (VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
1 / 1
Mohammed Ashfaque Ansari
Deputy Hydraulic Engineer
Vasanti A. Naik
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court