Ghulam Rasool Abdul Wahid Khwaja and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra through S.D.O. and Spl. Land Acqusition Officer and Ors.

¶1

14.WP8134_2014.doc

¶2

Vidya Amin

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION No. 8134 OF 2014

¶5

Ghulam Rasool Abdul Wahid Khwaja & Ors. … Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra, through S.D.O. & Spl. Land Acquisition Officer & Ors. … Respondents

¶6

Mr. N.R. Bubna, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. C.P. Yadav, AGP for respondent no. 1. Mr. R.B. Raghuvanshi i/b. Ms. Rutuja Amberkar, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 to 23.

¶7

Mr. Ankit Kulkarni i/b. Little & Co., Advocate for respondent no. 24.

¶8

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & C.V. BHADANG, JJ. DATE : 2^nd February, 2015.

¶9

P.C.

¶10

Heard.

¶11

Mr. Bubna, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners would file an application seeking a reference of the dispute in regard to the payment of compensation under section 35 of the M.I.D.C. Act to the State Government and the State Government should be directed to refer the matter to the Civil Court. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition in this background.

¶12

The petitioners are permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition.

¶13

1 of 2

¶14

14.WP8134_2014.doc

¶15

The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. However, if the petitioners file an application under section 35 of the M.I.D.C. Act, the concerned officer of the State should take a decision for making the reference of the same to the Civil Court as early as possible and positively within a period of four weeks.

¶16

Order accordingly.

¶17

(C.V. BHADANG, J.)

¶18

(VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)

¶19

2 of 2

Ghulam Rasool Abdul Wahid Khwaja and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra through S.D.O. and Spl. Land Acqusition Officer and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ghulam Rasool Abdul Wahid Khwaja and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra through S.D.O. and Spl. Land Acqusition Officer and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shirish R. Kale Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors.

Mrs.Rashmi Mahesh Tawade Vs the Clare Road Jesus and Mery Society and 4 Ors.

Sunil Babani H.U.F. Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 53 Ors.

Amar Ramchandra Bhalerao Vs Education Inspector (West Zone) and Ors.

Shri Mahadeo Bajirao Nagane Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.

M/S. Anupam Developers through It'S Constituted Attorney Mr. Surinder Singh Solar Vs Shri. Gangadhar Narayan Biwalkar and Ors.