The High Court at Bombay disposed of Criminal Writ Petition No. 78 of 2015 as infructuous because the main proceeding had already been terminated.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 78 OF 2015
(Shaikh Mainu s/o. Shaikh Ibrahim Vs. Nasrinbee w/o. Shaikh Mainu & Ors.)
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
|---|---|
| Mr. G.G. Suryawanshi, Advocate for petitioner. | |
| CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : 8th July, 2015. |
|
| PER COURT : | |
| 1. The learned counsel for petitioner on instruction | |
| submits that in the present proceeding interim order was challenged, but it is informed to him that the main proceeding itself is disposed of and so, the present proceeding has become infructuous. In view of this statement, the petition is disposed of as infructuous. |
|
| [ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ] ssc/ |
Shaikh Mainu
Nasrinbee
T.V. Nalawade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
