Writ petition for admission to contest an election dismissed. Court held that the petitioner failed to comply with requirements under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act and refused the necessary indulgence as election stages were largely completed.
Writ petition dismissed; Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-7497.15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 7497 OF 2015
Ravindra Ninaji Kandelkar Age 27 years, occup. Agril. R/o At post Nimkhedi (BK), Tq. Muktainagar, Dist.Jalgaon .... Petitioner
versus
Mr. Vijay B. Patil, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S. K. Tambe, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for respondent no. 1 Mr. S. T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent no. 2
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. 30TH JULY, 2015
ORAL JUDGMENT:
2
WP-7497.15
3 WP-7497.15
elections are over and the date of the order and intervening period, I am disinclined to grant any indulgence to petitioner.
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.
pnd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed to admit the petitioner to contest the election despite non-compliance with statutory requirements.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravindra Ninaji Kandelkar
The State of Maharashtra through it's Tahsildar, Muktainagar
The Returning Officer, Village Panchayat Nimkhedi (Bk)
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
