Disposed

Shri. Sambhaji Govind Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC7 Jan 2015WP/7460/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Bench disposed of a writ petition regarding the detention of a vehicle by RTO Mumbai Central. The court directed the release of the vehicle contingent upon the petitioner furnishing an undertaking to the RTO and tendering a demand draft of Rs. 20,000 as a security deposit.

What did the court decide?

Release of vehicle upon furnishing an undertaking to the RTO and depositing Rs. 20,000 via Demand Draft.

Shri. Sambhaji Govind Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors. — Bombay HC (2015) — LawSathi Research

¶1

wp7460.14.sxw

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 7460 OF 2014

¶4

Shri Sambhaji Govind Patil	...	Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & anr.	...	Respondents

¶5

Mr. Harshal N. Mirashi for the petitioner. Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for the State.

¶6

CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.S. GADKARI, JJ . 7th January, 2015.

¶7

P.C.

¶8

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶9

Learned AGP has placed reliance on the order passed by Division Bench of this Court (A.S. Oka & A.A. Sayed, JJ) in Writ Petition No. 4236 of 2014 on 29/4/2014 and order passed by Division Bench this Court (C.K. Thakker & Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud,JJ) in Writ Petition No. 1762/1999 on 3/3/2004.

¶10

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was plying the vehicle without any intention to violate the mandatory provisions and the orders passed by this Court. The vehicle is at present in custody of RTO, Mumbai Central. The said vehicle has been detained after noticing that it is not confirming to the standards and is in violation of the directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court on 3rd March, 2004 in the Writ Petition No.

wp7460.14.sxw

2/2

1762/1999.

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that an undertaking will be submitted to the RTO, Mumbai.

¶15

We have perused the above stated orders and considered the submissions. In the facts of the case we pass following order:

¶16

The vehicle shall be released with appropriate instructions and directions to the petitioner by respondent authority on furnishing an undertaking and on tendering Demand Draft of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand Only).

¶17

With aforesaid observations and direction, Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶18

L.S. Panjwani, P.S.

Shri. Sambhaji Govind Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Sambhaji Govind Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vitthal P. Chopade Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Urban Development Dept and Ors.

Smt. Indira Shreeniwas Desai Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shri. Shrawan Ganpat Sarode Vs Union of India, through Secretary, Ministry of Railway and Ors.

Shri. Gopinath Haribhau Desai Vs Commissioner of Sales Tax

Shri. Sashikant Sampat Mahale Vs the Commissioner, Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Shri. Kishore Pandurang Shelke Vs the Commissioner, Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation and Ors.