In this writ petition concerning retirement benefits, the High Court accepted the respondent's assurance of payment within four months due to a financial crisis and disposed of the petition with no order as to costs.
Writ petition disposed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.7346/2014
Anna Madhukarrao More
...Versus...
State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai – 32 and another
Shri Alok Daga, Advocate for petitioner Shri K.L. Dharmadhikari, AGP for respondent no.1 Shri M.G. Rathi, Advocate for respondent no.2
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 17.03.2015
By this petition the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent no.2 to pay the retiral benefits to the petitioner.
Shri Rathi, the learned Counsel for the respondent no.2 states that the retiral benefits could not be paid to the petitioner due to financial crisis and the same would be paid to the petitioner as early as possible and positively within a period of four months.
By accepting the statement made on behalf of the respondent no.2, which would be binding on the respondent no.2, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Wadkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent is directed to pay retirement benefits to the petitioner.
Anna Madhukarrao More
State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai
Another
Vasanti A. Naik
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
