Ayub Ismail Machkuri v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-7252.15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,BENCH AT .AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7252 OF 2015
Ayub s/o Ismail Machkuri ….. Petitioner vs The State Election Commission and others …... Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 7253 OF 2015
| Banu Ayub Machkuri vs |
…... | Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| The State Election Commission | ||
| and others | …... | Respondents |
Mr. Shrikant T. Veer, Advocate for petitioners Mr. S. T. Shelke, Advocate for respondents no.1 and 3 Mr. V. G. Shelke, Asstt.Govt.Pleader for respondent no. 2 Mr. Estling S. Murge, Advocate for respondent no. 5
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. 22ND JULY, 2015
ORDER:
2
WP-7252.15
Petitioners as well had submitted the birth certificates from the concerned office depicting that birth of last child, in fact, had taken place before cut off date, however, the same has not been relied on by returning officer. Additionally, in respect of writ petition no. 7253 of 2015, learned counsel points out that, in fact, the nomination had been validated by the returning officer, however, subsequently the order has undergone a change which according to him is apparent.
3
WP-7252.15
of their nominations, including grievance about fake birth certificates. It would also be open for petitioners to take up the matter in election petitions.
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.
pnd
Ayub s/o Ismail Machkuri
Banu Ayub Machkuri
The State Election Commission
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court