Petitioner in writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach an appropriate forum. The High Court of Bombay at Mumbai allowed the petition.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-70.13 os.sxw
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.70 OF 2013
Bhagvanji G. Raiyani
… Petitioner
Vs.
The Assistant Municipal Commissioner and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Bhagwanji G. Raiyani Petitioner in person.
Mr. Swanand Ganoo i/by Mr. Rajesh Ravindran for the Respondent Nos.3 to 6.
Mrs. N.A. Khandeparkar a/w Mr. Chandan Shekhawat for Respondent No.7.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & G.S. PATEL, JJ.
DATE : 14th DECEMBER, 2015
P.C.
. After tendering written arguments on record, the Petitioner
appearing in person seeks permission to withdraw this Petition with liberty to adopt appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. All contentions of the parties are kept open.
1 of 1
A.S. Oka
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
