This petition challenged an order rejecting a request for a DNA test in a regular suit for specific injunction. The High Court held that the paternity issue is relevant for a pending partition suit and plexed there, leading to the rejection of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 W.P.6886.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6886 OF 2015
Nandabai W/o Vishnu Ghongde, Age: 36 years, Occu.:Household, R/o : Thakur Nimgaon, at and post Shingori, Tq. Shevgaon, Dist. Ahmednagar. ...PETITIONERS
versus
Uttam Laxman Kholase, (Since deceased)
Mr. S.V. Natu, Advocate for Petitioner
2 W.P.6886.15
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.
DATED : 15th JULY, 2015
Order :-
3 W.P.6886.15
Sd/-
( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. )
MTK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a DNA test application in a suit for injunction is maintainable where the issue of paternity is relevant for a pending partition suit.
Nandabai W/o Vishnu Ghongde
Vandana W/o Laxman Wakde
Gangubai W/o Uttam Kholase
Sarika W/o Sanju Totre
Vilas Uttam Kholase
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
