Vatsala Narendra Mokshmar and Others Vs State of Maharshtra through Secretary , State Excise Deptt. Manteralaya, Mumbai and Others

Mr.S.R.Deshpande, counsel for the petitioners. Mr.N. Rao, AGP for the respondent No.1 to 3. None for the respondent No.4. Mr.A.Sambre, counsel for the respondent No.5.

¶11

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & A.M.BADAR, JJ.

¶12

DATE : 23.03.2015.

¶13

On hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, a notice for final disposal was issued to the respondents in regard to the prayer made by the petitioners for a direction to the Collector to decide the representation made by the petitioners.

¶14

Shri Rao, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the Collector, states that the Collector would decide the representation as early as possible.

¶15

Since the prayer made by the petitioners is innocuous, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Collector, Amravati to decide the representation of the petitioners as early as possible and positively within a period of three months. The parties undertake to appear before the Collector at Amravati on 06/04/2015 so that issuance of notice to the parties could be dispensed with.

¶16

Order accordingly. No costs.

¶17

JUDGE JUDGE

¶18

KHUNTE

Vatsala Narendra Mokshmar and Others v. State of Maharshtra through Secretary , State Excise Deptt. Manteralaya, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Vatsala Narendra Mokshmar and Others v. State of Maharshtra through Secretary , State Excise Deptt. Manteralaya, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit S/O Mahesh Naidu Vs Mrs. Sonam W/O Sumit Naidu

Arunodaya Magaswargiya Mazoor Kamgar Sahkari Sanstha Ltd., through Its President, Nagpur Vs the State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, Revenue and Forest Department, Mumbai and 2

Vasant S/O Gorba Bele Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mumbai and 3 Others

Sau. Bhumika W/O Bhaulal Tembhurnikar (Maiden Name Ku. Ratnamala Tarachand Nandeshwar) Vs Zilla Parishad Bhandara through Its C.E.O. Bhandara and Others

Gajanan Mahadeorao Deodhagale Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai and Another

Chandrashekhar S/O Sahebrao Bhise Vs Education Officer (Secondary), Z. P. Nagpur and 2 Others