In a writ petition, the High Court at Aurangabad examined an objection communicated by the Grievance Cell of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and rejected the petition for lack of substance with no interference required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.6393 OF 2013
Latabai Suresh Vasave
..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and anr.
..Respondents
Mr G.D.Jain, Advocate for petitioner Mr G.R.Ingole, A.G.P. for respondent No.1 Mr S.D.Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.2
CORAM : R.M. BORDE AND N.W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : 16th February 2015
PER COURT
( N.W. SAMBRE, J. ) ( R.M. BORDE, J. )
vvr
Latabai Suresh Vasave
The State of Maharashtra
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
R.M. Borde
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
