Disposed

Smt. Aruna Shailendra Renghe (Nee Aruna Gopalrao Kalbande) v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mumbai and 3 Others

Bombay HC31 Mar 2015WP/6140/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner agreed to face inquiry regarding voluntary retirement. Court disposed of writ petition, directing management to constitute inquiry committee and conclude inquiry within three months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to send nominee within two weeks; management to constitute committee and complete inquiry within three months.

Smt. Aruna Shailendra Renghe (Nee Aruna Gopalrao… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2015)

¶1

1 wp6140.14.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.6140 OF 2014

¶4

[Smt. Aruna Shailendra Renghe .vs. State of Maharashtra and others]

¶5

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶6

- - - - Shri Anand Parchure, counsel for the petitioner, Shri N.S. Rao, A.G.P. for the respondent no.1, Shri A.C. Dharmadhikari, counsel for the respondent no.2, Smt. Indira Bodade, counsel for the respondent no.3.

¶7

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

¶8

DATED : MARCH 31, 2015.

¶9

Shri Parchure, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, who is present in the Court today, states that the petitioner is not desirous of prosecuting the writ petition challenging the rejection of the application for voluntarily retirement, as the petitioner is ready to face the inquiry. It is stated that a direction may be issued to the respondent-management to complete the inquiry as early as possible.

¶10

On the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent-management to complete the inquiry against the petitioner and take appropriate decision within a period of three months from the date of the constitution of the committee, as even, according to the provisions of the Rules, the inquiry is required to be concluded within the said period. The respondent-management should constitute the committee within a period of two weeks. The petitioner should send the name of her nominee within the said period.

¶11

2 wp6140.14.odt

¶12

In view of aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of

¶13

with no order as to costs.

¶14

JUDGE

¶15

JUDGE

¶16

Gulande

Smt. Aruna Shailendra Renghe (Nee Aruna Gopalrao Kalbande) v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mumbai and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Aruna Shailendra Renghe (Nee Aruna Gopalrao Kalbande) v. State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mumbai and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kapil S/O Ashokrao Bendre Vs Union of India,Thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Finance (Department of Economic Affairs) and Others

Shri. Sunil S/O Nagorao Chorkar Vs Education Officer, Zilla Parishad Nagpur and 4 Others

Ramesh S/O Daulat Bhandare Vs the Registrar, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Science University, Nagpur

Santosh Patiram Gaiakwad Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Department of Road Transport, Mumbai and Others

M/S K.B. Constructions Company, Nagpur through Prop. Shri Kawaljit Singh S/O Balwant Singh Bhatia Vs Union of India, Mumbai through Chief Engineer (C) and 2 Others

Bhagwat Vitthal Kolhe Vs the State of Maharshtra, Througyh Secretary, Dept. of Cooperation, Mumbai and 2 Others