Allowed

Shri. Dilip Shantaram Pimpale and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept and Ors.

Bombay HC9 Dec 2015WP/5869/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition withdrawing the same with liberty to file an application for allotment of land. The court directed the Competent Authority to decide the fresh application within three months, keeping merit contentions open.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file application; Competent Authority directed to decide within three months; merits kept open.

Shri. Dilip Shantaram Pimpale and Ors. Vs the State of… — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2015)

wp5869

ssp

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.5869 OF 2012

¶7

Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders

¶8

Mr.N.V.Bandiwadekar for the Petitioner
Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
Mr.Sachin J. Kadam for respondent Nos.5 and 6.

¶9

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &

¶10

G.S.PATEL,JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 9, 2015.

¶11

P.C.

¶12

1The learned counsel for the

¶13

petitioners on instructions seeks
permission to withdraw this petition
with liberty to file an application for
allotment of a suitable land at village
Kumbhavali, Taluka Palghar, District
Palghar. He states that the application
will be made within a period of one
month from today.

¶14

2Hence, we dispose of the petition
by passing the following order:

¶15

(I) Writ petition is disposed of as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed;

¶16

2 wp5869

¶17

(II)If the petitioners make an
application for allotment of suitable
land at village Kumbhavali, Taluka
Palghar, District Palghar within a
period of one month from today to the
Collector, appropriate decision shall
be taken by the Competent Authority on
the said application as expeditiously
as possible and in any event within a
period of three months from the date on
which application is made;

¶18

(III) All contentions on merits are
kept open.

¶19

(G.S.PATEL,J.)

Shri. Dilip Shantaram Pimpale and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Dilip Shantaram Pimpale and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hiya Tarun Raheja Nee Sapna Kishore Naranag Vs the State of Maharashtra and 6 Ors.

Shree Maruti Sansthan Trust by Its Trustees and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Mubarak Rajubhai @ Jafar Mulani (Inamdar) Vs State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary and Ors.

Mr. Shyam Himmatrao Patil Vs Dr. Smita Sandeep Patil

Shri. a. L. Belur (Ananthakrishna Lakshminarasimhan Belur) and Ors. Vs Mumbai District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd.

Shri Rajendra Vyankatrao Pawar Vs Superitending Engineer, Small Scale Irrigation Circle and Ors.