Two writ petitions challenging Municipal Council election results were disposed of summarily as an efficacious remedy existed under the Daman and Diu Municipalities Regulations. All merits were kept open.
Petitions disposed of keeping the remedy under Regulations open; all contentions on merits kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp5825-12+1
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5825 OF 2012
Vasubhai S. Patel V/s.
The Returning Officer & Ors.
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
WRIT PETITION NO.6442 OF 2012
Baraiya Jitendrakumar Parbat ..Petitioner. V/s. The Returning Officer & Ors. ..Respondents.
..Respondents.
Mr. Kishan S. Patil for the petitioner. Mr.G. Hariharan i/b. Mr.H.P. Chaturvedi for the respondent No.5.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND
A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATED : 27TH FEBRUARY, 2015
P.C. :-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitions challenging Municipal Council election results need to be entertained when an efficacious remedy is available under Regulations.
Vasubhai S. Patel
Baraiya Jitendrakumar Parbat
The Returning Officer & Ors.
A.S. Oka
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
