This is a one-line order permitting the withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 582 of 2013 after counsel sought permission to avail an appropriate remedy, with points kept open.
Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
916.wp582_2013.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 582 OF 2013
Sharad Ganpat Gaikwad … Petitioner vs. M/s. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Education Society & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Sureshkumar J. Panicker, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Shamrao Fore i/b. Mr. Suresh Shinde, Advocate for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 5.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & C.V. BHADANG, JJ. DATE : 29th January, 2015.
P.C.
Heard.
Since several disputed questions of facts are involved in this Writ
Petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would avail an appropriate remedy. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition in this background.
Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition is granted.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
The points raised in the Writ Petition are kept open.
1 of 2
916.wp582_2013.doc
The Court or forum may consider whether the time spent by the petitioner in this Court, could be excluded while considering the question of delay.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.)
(VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
2 of 2
Sharad Ganpat Gaikwad
M/s. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Education Society & Ors.
VASANTI A. NAIK
C.V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
