Petitioner challenged internal transfer of a retired respondent via writ jurisdiction. Court held petition infructuous as respondent was retired and disposed of accordingly.
Petition disposed of as infructuous noting respondent was retired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1/1 566.14wp.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 566 OF 2014
Shri Swami Samarth Apang Seva Mandal. ... Petitioner. V/s. The Commissioner, Handicap Welfare, Maharashtra State and others. ... Respondents.
Tejas D. Deshmukh for the petitioners.
P.P.Kakade, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 5.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.S. GADKARI, JJ.
DATED : 5th January 2015.
P.C.
Heard.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Sanjay Nanoskar, P.S..
Shri Swami Samarth Apang Seva Mandal
The Commissioner, Handicap Welfare, Maharashtra State
NARESH H. PATIL
A.S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
