The High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 550 of 2015 regarding Section 5 of the Mathadi Act, retaining merits for the Advisory Board decision while granting liberty.
Petition disposed of with liberty to approach the Advisory Board under Section 5 of the Mathadi Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP550-12.2
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.550 OF 2015
B.G. Exploration and Production India Limited versus
State of Maharashtra and others
...Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Mr. Arshad Shaikh with Mr. Azmin Irani with Mr. Nand Kishore with Mr. Murtaza Kachwalla i/b has Advocates for the Petitioner. Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for the State.
….. CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & A.S. GADKARI, JJ.
12th February, 2015.
P.C. :
Heard the learned counsel.
The learned AGP submits that the application filed by the Petitioner under Section 5 of the Mathadi Act will be decided by the Advisory Board within two weeks on its own merits. The Petitioner is entitled to bring the statement to the notice of the Trial Court
All contentions on merits are kept open.
The Petition is disposed of with liberty.
(Naresh H. Patil, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.G. Exploration and Production India Limited
State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
A.S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
