Eastern Free Way which project was implemented by the Respondent No.2 herein. It seems that a survey was carried out in the year 2006 and in the said survey it was revealed that the Petitioner had one structure which was being used both for residential and commercial purpose. The said structure was identified by ID No.155 in the said survey. The Petitioner was accordingly allotted permanent alternate accommodation by way of shop at the site designated for rehabilitation. The same was done some time in the year 2010. However, prior thereto, it seems, that the Petitioner was given a provisional allotment of a tenement for residential user. However, in view of the fact that the Petitioner was contending that the said structure was being used for commercial purpose and the Petitioner was desirous of getting a commercial premises as and by way of permanent alternate accommodation, that the said allotment for commercial user was made. It seems that after the said allotment for commercial user was made, the Petitioner started making a grievance as regards his entitlement to the allotment of permanent alternate accommodation for residential user. In support of the said case, before the Competent Authority i.e. the Deputy Collector (Encroachment/Removal) the Petitioner relied upon two electricity bills. In so far as the Electricity Connection No.G-16941301 is concerned, the same was disconnected in the year 2001 and the second Electricity Connection No.G-68941432 is concerned, the same was disconnected in the year 2007. The Deputy Collector therefore on the basis of the said documents came to a conclusion that the Petitioner had
