The High Court directed the First and Second Respondents to decide a pending application (dated 11/03/2013) expeditiously by 27/02/2015. All contended merits were kept open.
Direction to decide Application dated 11th March 2013 on or before 27th February 2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ash
wp(l)-318
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (LODG.) NO.318 OF 2015
Mohammed Rafique Mohammed Husain Tinwala.
.. Petitioner
Vs
State of Maharashtra and Others. .. Respondents
Shri S.M. Gorwadkar, Senior Advocate i/by Shri Nitesh S. Acharya for the Petitioner.
Smt. K.R. Punjabi for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 BMC. Shri U.S. Upadhyaye, AGP for the State. Shri Naaz S. Charolia for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K.MENON, JJ DATED : 11TH FEBRUARY 2015
P.C.
. Not on board. Taken on board.
Respondents does not dispute that the Application dated 11th March 2013 is pending.
ORDER :
(a) We direct the First and the Second Respondents to
decide the Application dated 11th March 2013 as
ash
wp(l)-318
2
expeditiously as possible and in any event, on or before 27th February 2015.
(c) All concerned to act upon an authenticated copy of this order.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ court can direct the respondents to decide a pending application expeditiously.
Whether the contentions of the parties on merits can be kept open while granting a direction.
Mohammed Rafique Mohammed Husain Tinwala
State of Maharashtra
BMC
A.S. Oka
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
