The High Court summarily dismissed a writ petition challenging criminal prosecution for cheque dishonour. The bench held that a factual dispute exists regarding the amount filled in a blank cheque, which requires adjudication by the trial court.
Petition summarily dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-wp-453.2015.sxw
.. 1 ..
hvn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY . CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 453 OF 2015
Rajesh G. Uchil and anr.
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra and anr. … Respondents
Mr. C.K. Tripathi for the petitioners.
Mr. D.R. More, A.P.P. for State.
CORAM : M.L. TAHALIYANI, J. DATED : MARCH 17, 2015
P.C.
Admit. By consent of the parties taken up forthwith for final
hearing.
904-wp-453.2015.sxw
.. 2 ..
cheque dishonoured and filed criminal prosecution against the petitioners.
(JUDGE)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the amount filled in the blank cheque exceeded the authorized limit or constituted misrepresentation requiring trial.
Rajesh G. Uchil
State of Maharashtra
M.L. TAHALIYANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
