The High Court of Bombay granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the Writ Petition, subsequently disposing of the matter as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
36.WPL989_2014.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L.) NO. 989 OF 2014
Anil Morarji Kenia … Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. A.M. Saraogi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.P. Jadhav, AGP for respondent no. 1. Ms. Shobha Ajitkumar, Advocate for respondent no. 2.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & C.V. BHADANG, JJ. DATE : 18th February, 2015.
P.C.
Mr. Saraogi, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is desirous of filing a Contempt Petition against the officers of the respondent/Corporation. The learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition in this background.
Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition is granted.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(C.V. BHADANG, J.)
(VASANTI A. NAIK, J.)
1 of 1
Anil Morarji Kenia
The State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
